Loading...
For architecture studios
Your projects up front — restrained type, the images carry. Inquiry path and your own domain built in. From 0 DKK.
A studio site is judged on what it shows and in what order. The grid is the identity; the project page is where the argument is finished. Every part of it is yours to arrange — the platform never curates on your behalf, and it never runs the projects it presents.
Which project opens the site, what sits beside what, how much room each one gets. Sequencing is a design decision, so it stays a decision you make.
Year, location, typology, your role, area. The same fields on every project, so a reader can compare them without hunting through prose.
The anatomy is image-first: type and interface stay out of the way. Bring real project photography — nothing is enhanced or generated for you, and the site is only ever as strong as the images in it.
Interior work sits in the same portfolio as the buildings, described in your words. It is a strand of the studio's practice, not a separate site to maintain.
Who the studio is, who does the work, and what they hold. Titles and memberships are entries you make, and Sitenyx never states a protected qualifier on your behalf.
How the practice works, what it takes on, and what it declines. The paragraph a prospective client reads before looking at anything else.
The MAA qualifier is protected. It appears on the site because you entered it, never because a template assumed it — the platform will not pre-fill it, imply it, or write it into the site's structured data for you.
Architects, constructing architects and staff with their fields and years — the page that answers who will actually be on the project.
Two ways in, both built in: a structured inquiry form and, if it suits the studio, a first-consultation booking. What the form asks for is your choice.
Project type, scope, site and timing in fields you define, so the first conversation starts from something real.
Booking is optional and as easy to switch off as on. Private clients tend to use it; developers tend to write instead.
Images, pages and inquiries sit on EU-resident infrastructure. It is the default, not a setting you have to go and find.
The studio's domain with automatic TLS. The link in an article, an award submission or an email is yours, not a platform's.
Both at parity, from 20 available languages, so an international client reads the same portfolio a Danish one does.
Inquiry forms are privacy-first, and the site's statistics can run without cookies.
The AI does the typing. Every design decision stays yours.
Say what the practice does and which projects matter, in Danish or English. No brief to prepare and no intake meeting.
You get pages, sequence and fields to work from — a starting point you direct, never a finished opinion about your work.
Publish when it meets your own standard, on your own domain, and change it again the moment it stops meeting it.
The free tier publishes. That is deliberate: this is a judgement you should make against a real site rather than a screenshot.
Prices are monthly and shown in DKK. No paywall before publishing, no minimum number of users, and no sales call to unlock anything.
See pricingYou are the buyer most likely to have opened both already. They give a design-literate user deeper control over layout, motion and detail than this platform does, with a far larger component and template market behind them. We are not going to pretend otherwise.
Framer and Webflow give control over layout and motion down to the detail, a mature component ecosystem, and a template market with real range behind it.
Time to live, data resident in the EU, inquiry forms, booking and invoicing already in the site, and DKK from 0 — without hiring a designer to get started.
The anatomy is image-first: your photography carries the site and the interface stays out of its way. Bring real project photos — nothing is enhanced or generated for you, and the site is only as strong as the images in it.
Judge that yourself before committing. The AI drafts, you direct and edit every decision, and the free tier publishes with no paywall first. We are not going to hand you a verdict on our own work.
Yes, when you hold it. MAA is a protected qualifier, so it appears only because you entered it — Sitenyx never pre-fills it, implies it, or puts it into the site's structured data on your behalf.
Both at parity on one site, out of 20 languages. The same portfolio reads for a Danish client, an international one, and an editor asking for material.
Yes. The domain is the studio's, the pages and images are yours, and all of it is hosted on EU-resident infrastructure.
A structured form — project type, scope, timing — plus an optional first-consultation booking. Both are built in, both store submissions in the EU, and you decide what the form asks.
A preview costs nothing and needs no account. Publish only if it holds up.
We accept